The Government is looking at making motorists take their car for an MoT test every two years, instead of the current annual test.
It is also considering having new cars first tested when they reach four years old, not three years, as is currently the case.
The Government review is part of a plan to cut red tape, and it could save drivers up to £465 million. If it goes ahead, the testing schedule would bring the UK into line with the rest of the European Union.
The review has raised concerns over safety - the RAC Foundation said: 'Newer cars are more reliable and safer, but some motorists only find out they need new brakes or tyres at an MoT.'
MoT Testers are also worried about the scheme. MoT Tester magazine says: 'Almost a third of vehicles currently MOT tested annually fail the MoT, mainly on tyres, brakes and lights - all safety critical components. This move could have serious implications for road safety. Currently the MoT Test is a crucial element in British roads being amongst the safest in Europe.'
What do you think?
You could save £50.35 every second year, and new cars are safer - but are these plans sensible? Click here if you think it's a good idea.
Is it more money-saving madness? Will safety - and the reputation of Britain's roads - suffer because of penny-pinching? Click here if you think it’s a dangerous idea.
Our reviews are based on hard data and thorough testing in the real world.
Up to the minute news from around the globe
Get a car insurance quote from over 100 companies with What Car? Compare in less than five minutes
What Car?
is brought to you by
Haymarket Consumer Media