We use cookies on whatcar.com to improve your browsing experience and to provide you with relevant content and advertising, by continuing to use our site you agree to this. Please see our privacy policy for more details. Continue

How reliable is your car? - Renault to Seat

27 October 2006
RENAULT 25th
2005 position 25th
Claims per 100 vehicles 44.7
Average age 4.7 years
Average mileage 46,785
Average repair cost £288
Average repair time2.5 hours

Problem areas
One bald fact tells the story: 44.7% of Renault owners had to have repairs on their cars. It's a high strike rate, and it puts the French make near the foot of the reliability league table.

Axle and suspension woes blighted almost 40% of the Clios affected and more than 30% of the Lagunas that had repairs done. Electrical glitches accounted for more than 40% of repairs on '99-'02 Meganes.

However, owners will be relieved to hear that labour rates aren't too monstrous - an average of £47 an hour puts Renault in the wallet-friendly league.

Best model Clio ('91-'98)
Worst model Espace ('97-'02)

Verdict *
The Renault Espace (1997-02) is at the foot of What Car?'s reliability table for the second year running. Hopefully, the next-generation Espace will prove to be more solid.

ROVER 12th
2005 position 27th
Claims per 100 vehicles 30.5
Average age 4 years
Average mileage 39,173
Average repair cost £294
Average repair time2.9 hours

Problem areas
Rover's reputation for poor unreliability is pretty unfounded. In fact, owning a Rover is not that scary a proposition if you have a later model - the 45 was 11th and the 25 was 13th in the overall league table.

Half of the 25s that needed repairs had work on their electrics and 19% had engine faults. The major problems for 45 owners relate to the axle and suspension. The 600 also suffered its fair share of electrical glitches - almost 40% of cars which visited the workshop needed work in this area. Labour rates are comparatively cheap: the average hourly rate is £43.

Best model 25 ('99-'05)
Worst model 800 ('91-'99)

Verdict ***
It appears the 25 and the 45 are a safe bet: the older Rover models, predictably, have proved unreliable.

SAAB 23rd
2005 position 29th
Claims per 100 vehicles 41.6
Average age 4.7 years
Average mileage 57,716
Average repair cost £321
Average repair time2.4 hours

Problem areas
Although the table shows Saab well down the list, there are no glaring problem areas on the 9-3 and the 9-5 - just a wide spread of niggles. The biggest issues on the 9-3 were with the axle and suspension - 25% of the cars needing repairs had work done on this particular area. The 9-5's weakest link was its electrical system, with more than 30% of cars affected reporting problems here. Interestingly, the older 900 proved more reliable than the later 9-3 and 9-5.

Best model 900 ('93-'98)
Worst model 9-5 ('97-'01)

Verdict *
The telling statistic for Saab is that more than 44% of cars needed repairs. Both the 9-3 and the 9-5 finished well down the table.

SEAT 21st
2005 position 12th
Claims per 100 vehicles 40.1
Average age 3.5 years
Average mileage 43,140
Average repair cost £223
Average repair time2.2 hours

Problem areas
More than 35% of the Leons that visited workshops suffered electrical problems, and 29% of them had issues with their heating and cooling systems. If a Seat breaks down, it'll spend an average of two hours in the workshop, and you are likely to be charged £60 an hour for labour.

Best model Leon ('00-)
Worst model na (one model in survey)

Verdict *
The Leon finished well down the order and that affected Seat's overall position in the manufacturers' table.

Click here for a manufacturers' reliability table.