The other thing that started to annoy me early on was the ride quality. Once I got onto a smooth motorway things were fine, but it was a different story in town.
At low speed the ride was jiggly, which probably wasn’t helped by either the run-flat tyres or the larger alloys I picked, but it was too harsh for a grand tourer.
Road bumps thumped their way into the cabin, too.
Day-to-day life with the 5 GT wasn’t that bad, though. Not including my boot issues and the low-speed ride, using the car for work duties was a good experience – and I got the best from the BMW on long-distance motorway trips.
One of the best things about the car was its 241bhp 3.0-litre diesel engine: it was strong and silky smooth – which was just what I needed when I was really racking up the miles. The eight-speed automatic gearbox was equally slick when changing gear.
Most useful, though, were the cameras. The 5 GT’s long nose presented a few problems when trying to edge out into traffic, but the side-view cameras at the front meant I only had to poke the nose out to check for other cars.
Bangs, scrapes – and conkers
The car’s rear visibility wasn’t great, either, so I’m glad I got the rear parking camera. It worked a treat… apart from on one occasion: I was reversing into a space in a multi-storey car park and everything was fine – the camera said so, as did the parking sensors. What I hadn’t taken into account was the wall behind me, which jutted out above the camera and sensors. I nudged the wall and left a dent in the boot lid.
That wasn’t the only incident. In the early autumn a couple of conkers fell onto the bonnet and roof, which left more dents in the bodywork. The low-profile tyres meant that any close encounters with kerbs led to dinged alloys, too. Repairing the dents and refurbishing the wheels cost £517.
There were a few other things I had to fork out for, too. Two of the run-flat tyres had to be replaced at around 19,000 miles (a pricey £660), while a third was done at Cooper Thames Ditton during the first service (which accounted for £379 of the £734 bill).
The official fuel economy figure for this car is 43.5mpg, but I got a very disappointing 32.6. Maybe it had something to do with the larger wheels, or the extra weight of my photography gear, but I was hoping it would be better.
The value of the car also plummeted during the year. Although it had higher-than-average mileage, I was still astonished that the part-exchange value was around £20,000 less than my 5 GT was worth new.
So was the 5 GT a superhero or villain? Some areas of the car were fabulous, such as the tech and the comfy cabin, but it just wasn’t up to dealing with my work demands. I’d have a BMW again, but I don’t think it would be this one.