For Lavishly equipped, with leather, sat-nav, a panoramic glass roof, premium stereo, heated front seats and a rear-view camera. It's impressive, as is the 2.2 engine.
Against Do you really need all that kit? It’s impressive, but it’s pricey too, and it seats only five where some similarly priced 4x4s have space for seven.
Hugely impressive but you’ll have to decide if it's worth the big outlay over well equipped-mid-range models. This is definitely the engine to go for though.
The CR-V does most of the jobs you’d expect very well. It shines on the school run, the commute or a weekend with kids. You wouldn’t make it your first choice if you need to go off road, however.
There’s bags of adaptable space in the cabin and boot. Split-folding rear seats slide, and the big loadbay has a double floor for more flexibility.
Both engines are smooth, but the diesel is the better choice, because it gives more low-end torque and far superior economy. However, the CR-V is now a bit long in the tooth compared with many other SUVs, and its figures for fuel consumption and emissions are nowhere near those of the class leaders.
Kit levels are good across the board, whether you’re looking at safety or creature comforts, although you’ll probably like the extras of the mid-range ES over the cheaper models. Honda dealers are very tight with their discounts, but you can still save a little.
I've had the car from new and it is now 8 months…
I have had my Honda ctdi 2.2 Es for 3 years now…
I am about to purchase my 4th CR-V. Undecided…
Nearly every review I read of the CRV favoured the…