For The Kalos has a comfortable ride, and there's plenty of room for four people
Against It's dull to drive and the cabin plastics feel low-rent. The steering is uncommunicative, too.
Verdict
It's a reasonable car, but other rivals provide more for similar money
Go for… 1.4 16v SX
Avoid… 1.4 8v
The Kalos isn’t a bad car, far from it in fact. It's just that there are many more able cars out there that provide more talent and better value for similar, or even less, money.
Among its strengths are its good ride, which soaks up most bumps very effectively. It's reasonably spacious, too, pretty well equipped towards the top of the range and wind and road noise are kept to a minimum.
However, the car doesn't like being chucked into a corner, with body roll and tyre squeal being all too evident. The engines can be breathless and raucous, as well, while the steering is light and uncommunicative, and the cabin is drab.
In short, it does all the major stuff with a reasonable amount of competence, but it doesn't excel in any area; not worthy of a detention but short on house points.
John OwenCheap as chips, but too much vinegar
There are three trim levels to choose from: S, SE and SX. The base S trim is available only with the 1.2 engine and gives you no more than a passable amount of kit including central locking, electric front windows and anti-lock brakes.
SE trim adds remote central locking and side airbags, whereas we prefer SX trim, which does much better: air-con, electric rear windows and a CD player are all provided.
The Kalos has had three engines during its life. The basic 70bhp 1.2 potters along very nicely and cruises well, but it's slow. There are also two versions of the 1.4-litre unit: an eight-valve with 83bhp and a 16-valve with 92bhp. In both cases there's a little more performance on tap than in the 1.2, but a lot more noise as well.
James RuppertReasonable demand for most models, although 1.2 SE in oversupply
When the Kalos was new, its prices were reasonably competitive with other superminis. However, its residual values aren't as bad as you might expect, so you might not get as much of a bargain as you hoped. That said, no Kalos is what you'd call expensive.
Running costs are reasonable, too. All versions hover around the 40mpg mark for fuel consumption, and insurance costs are nice and cheap, too. The 1.2 falls into group 3 for insurance, while the 1.4 versions range between groups 4 and 5.
Servicing costs are around average for the class, as are the 10,000-mile service intervals.
John OwenCheap as chips, but too much vinegar
Daewoo has a pretty solid record when it comes to reliability, and the Kalos also happens to be one of Daewoo's most dependable models, according to our data.
Some owners report that the front wheels are easily knocked out of alignment - by hitting a kerb, for example - and that makes the tyres wear a lot faster than normal. You could need a fresh set every 10,000 miles, so it's worth getting the alignment checked before you buy and checking for excessive tyre wear on any potential buy. One or two clutch faults have been reported, too, so keep an eye on that on your test drive.
James RuppertReasonable demand for most models, although 1.2 SE in oversupply