We use cookies on whatcar.com to improve your browsing experience and to provide you with relevant content and advertising, by continuing to use our site you agree to this. Please see our privacy policy for more details. Continue
Having previously owned a BMW 320D SE I was a little apprehensive about taking delivery of the Tino, afterall, it does cost 10 grand less.
After driving the Tino home from work after delivery, I was surprised how comfortable I felt on that relatively short journey. The ride was quite good, the handling surprisingly good, and the performance much better than I had expected.
It had a lot of equipment and gave a very commanding view of the road for what is not a large vehicle. However, I put this good feeling down to the warmth that taking delivery of a brand new car brings.
I have had the car for three months now and covered over 5000 miles. My initial views of the vehicle have proved to be right. It is a very nice, underrated car. Interior trim may be a bit plasticky, it is noisier at speed that my BMW, and the controls are a little unusual and could be confusing if you do not use the car regularly.
I have owned about 17 cars now, so have had a great deal of experience in many different types of vehicle. I would rate the Tino as the best value for money car I have owned. It is practical, comfortable and reliable (my BMW had been to the delaers at least four times by now, including a massive oil leak and a new clutch) and economical.
Things that I would change? A larger fuel tank would be nice, cruise control, and ditch those left-hand-drive wipers. (They do work, they just feel wrong.)
The light and airy cabin gives great all-round visibility. All instruments are easy to use and within reach.
It's good to drive, with taut handling and crisp precise steering. The gearchange can be a bit vague at times.
Its build quality is good, but the car lacks the solidity of a previously owned Zafira. On long runs, the climate-control air-con is invaluable as is the interior comfort. It means you arrive not too stressed out.
In short - a practical, well-thought-out but not brilliant MPV.
I bought this car brand new. It's excellent to drive, with great visibility, and very comfortable, with a high driving position.
It's great on the motorways with the six-speed gearbox, it just cruises along. The steering is fine and precise. The fuel efficiency around town on average is 41mpg, and on longer journeys around 48mpg-49mpg.
It has excellent equipment for the reduced price, with an electric sunroof, mirrors, half-leather trim etc.
The only niggle is the paintwork is easily scratched. I have spent a fortune on different car polishes to try to remove scratches etc. But apart from that, it's an excellent car and I believe very much underated.
I am disappointed with the fuel consumption according to Nissan combined fuel figure is 36.7mpg, which is also what you suggest it should be. However, I only get 32.4mpg I have taken this up with the dealer who did a diagnostic test said there was nothing wrong with the car and 32.4mpg was good. Am I being fobbed off? Should I take the matter up with Nissan? I am a very careful driver, have had Nissan cars for years and have always achieved the mpg stated in the manufacturers literature.
Order a brochure, find your nearest dealer or book a test drive
After having several larger engined prestige cars I wanted a car that was just that: a car. Not a status symbol, not a racing machine, just a…
Bought a 2003 model 2.0 HDi diesel second hand in 2004 and still running it in 2012. 11,000 miles at purchase is now 113,000. Never broken down, but…
Advertisement
What Car?
is brought to you by
Haymarket Consumer Media