We use cookies on whatcar.com to improve your browsing experience and to provide you with relevant content and advertising, by continuing to use our site you agree to this. Please see our privacy policy for more details. Continue

Overall reader verdict 4 out of 5 stars

  • What's it like to drive
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Running costs
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Quality, practicality and equipment
    3 out of 5 stars

Own or drive this car?

Submit your own review here
100 reader reviews for Renault Clio Hatchback.
  • 1.2 16v Expression 5dr

    Chris Hyamson , asdasdasd . Date: 17/09/2007
    • Overall verdict
      4 out of 5 stars
    • What's it like to drive
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Running costs
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Quality, practicality and equipment
      4 out of 5 stars

    My car

    I have just brought my Renault Clio Expression a few days ago. I must say that the Sunroof is very noisy and the handling in the wet is not the best... but the rest of the time the car is first class!

    It's responsive and actually sticks to the road, the 1.2 16v engine is extremely capable and suprisingly quick for a renault. The clio is on a 03 plate and the car is faultless other than the above. Petrol costs are very reasonable and I seem to get around 180 - 190miles on £25 of petrol. All in all it is a very fun car, and seems sturdy and reliable.

  • 1.6 RXE 5dr

    Ian Jennings , Kent . Date: 17/09/2007
    • Overall verdict
      2 out of 5 stars
    • What's it like to drive
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Running costs
      3 out of 5 stars
    • Quality, practicality and equipment
      2 out of 5 stars

    My car

    This is a cheap and cheerful car. The 1.6 engine has plenty of poke and it is very light making it fun to drive - even motorways are tolerable, as it is quite capable of keeping up with any motorway traffic.

    It also has a quite funky fingertip control for the stereo which is unusual for a small cheap car this age, as well as air-con, electric front windows and a sunroof, so it is well equiped.

    However, there are some basic issues. Rear legroom is a joke - it's OK for kids, but not for adults. The windscreen wipers go the wrong way, though this was rectified on more recent models, but is indicative of the lazy attitude of the manufacturer.

    The auxilary drive belt is really loose, even with the pre-tensioner and after replacing it twice, and having to stop and pick it up off the road on a number of occasions, I had a modifed pretensioner fitted which seems to have solved this, but it is basic and just shouldn't happen.

    Also, somehow mine has chewed its way through three sets of front discs in just 42,000 miles! I accept that I drive the car (rather than just operating it), but they should last longer than that.

    Essentially this is a car that will reward you from a driving point of view - just don't expect the sort of build quality and attention to detail you might get on something German like a Polo.

    If you are young or old and want something to drive around town that you can use occasionally on motorways, this will do a job.

  • 2.0 16v Renaultsport 182 3dr

    Stuart Rawsthorne Date: 04/09/2007
    • Overall verdict
      4 out of 5 stars
    • What's it like to drive
      5 out of 5 stars
    • Running costs
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Quality, practicality and equipment
      3 out of 5 stars

    My car

    I bought this model in October 2005 from a car supermarket. I saved nearly £3000 on the book price as it was an import.

    Overall it is a quick, well handling and go-kart like drive. It is subtle with its twin tail exhausts and has a long pedigree in the small hot hatches. The seats are comfy and side hugging and the Alcantra is pleasing on th eye.

    Now for the bad points: The interior build is average, with poor fitting doors and hinges. The lock to lock turn is poor. The vehicle needs a load of revs whilst reversing - otherwise it will stall.

    And thats it really.

    Maybe I'm picky, as the handling and high-revving engine are a delight.

    You can really throw it around and it sticks like glue.

    It's thirsty if you drive it hard, but that's what it was made for.

    Recommended.

  • 1.4 16v Expression 5dr

    Tasos Maragoudakis Date: 22/08/2007
    • Overall verdict
      4 out of 5 stars
    • What's it like to drive
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Running costs
      4 out of 5 stars
    • Quality, practicality and equipment
      3 out of 5 stars

    My car

    I owned this car since June 2003, have covered 52,000km and sold it a couple of days before due to family expansion (need something much bigger).

    The car was very satisfactory in terms of driving and performance, and also I liked very much the style.

    In terms of fuel economy, it proved very good and the best range I have achieved was approximately 750lm with only 45lt (the total capacity of the fuel tank).

    The weak points were the space for the rear passengers (expected for a 3.77m car), the driving position, and the clutch.

    In these four years, I had three problems which cost me in total 60 Euros. An alarm button stuck and was replaced (18€), and the starter motor cables were cut and had to be replaced (25€). The airbag light came on due to faulty de-activation switch of passenger airbag which was also replaced (21€).

    Renault here in Greece was very helpful.

    All in all, it's a very competitive little car, capable of giving also some driving happiness.

Renault Clio Hatchback

Continue to prices, equipment and options »

What Car? buying help and car info

Order a brochure, find your nearest dealer or book a test drive

Haymarket Logo What Car? is brought to you by Haymarket Consumer Media
What Car? is part of Haymarket Motoring
© Haymarket Media Group 2014