The modelRead full review
People talk about things like “charm” and “character” when discussing the Fiat Panda, but the cold, hard facts that we measure cars by prove it to be a poor choice. It's very disappointing to drive and isn’t very practical, but by far the worst thing about it is its abysmal Euro NCAP safety rating. There are, quite simply, far better cars to choose from.
The trimSee full equipment
The City Cross is pretty basic, with 15in alloys, electric front windows and air conditioning the only real highlights. The City Life version makes more financial sense, although doesn't have the 4x4-inspired styling of this model
The engineSee full engine specs
The Panda’s 69bhp mild hybrid system is of the kind seen in the Suzuki Ignis; there's a naturally aspirated 1.0-litre three-cylinder engine is aided by a small lithium-ion battery and tiny electric motor that, in theory, boosts acceleration. However, you wouldn't know it. You really have to work the gears hard to make any meaningful progress and, even then, 0-62mph takes a tardy 13.8sec. That's quite a bit slower than any Dacia Sandero and only slightly quicker than an entry-level 1.0 Kia Picanto.
Fun to drive, practical for a city car and good value, to...
A fine small car at a stunningly good price but disappointing...
Spacious, quiet, comfortable and good value on PCP financ...
An improvement over its predecessor, but it continues to lag b...