Feature

New Suzuki Swift vs Hyundai i20

The latest version of Suzuki’s small hatchback faces a plethora of rivals. First up, it’s the Hyundai i20

Words ByWhat Car? team

Need a valuation?

Obtain a FREE used car valuation for any vehicle.

GB

Hyundai i20 vs Suzuki Swift

Our verdict

This latest Swift continues Suzuki’s tradition of offering generously equipped cars for not much money. It has a strong, frugal engine to boot, plus it’s good fun to drive and reasonably roomy in the back.

Hyundai takes the win, though, with its i20 beating the Swift for space, practicality and interior quality. It’s also slightly more comfortable and has a much better infotainment system. Its incredibly low price and cheaper running costs are merely the icing on the cake.

For all the latest reviews, advice and new car deals, sign up to the What Car? newsletter here


1st – Hyundai i20

For More comfortable ride; better infotainment; classier interior

Against Noisier engine; numb steering; less safety kit

Verdict Generous space and equipment for an almost unbelievable price

Rated 5 out of 5

Read our full Hyundai i20 review

Find a great Hyundai i20 deal


2nd – Suzuki Swift

For More agile handling; more standard kit; stronger engine

Against Cheaper-feeling interior; fiddly infotainment system; smaller boot

Verdict A decent small car, but cheaper trim levels make more sense

Rated 3 out of 5

Read our full Suzuki Swift review

Find a great Suzuki Swift deal


Also consider;


Specifications: Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 100 Turbo Edition

Engine size 998cc, 3cyl, turbo, petrol

List price Β£13,275

Target Price Β£12,963

Power 98bhp @ 4500rpm

Torque 127lb ft @ 1500-4000rpm

0-60mph 9.8sec

Top speed 116mph

Gov't fuel economy 62.8mpg

CO2 emissions 104g/km


Specifications: Suzuki Swift 1.0 Boosterjet SHVS SZ5

Engine size 998cc, 3cyl, turbo, petrol

List price Β£14,499

Target Price Β£14,499

Power 110bhp @ 5500rpm

Torque 125lb ft @ 1700-4000rpm

0-60mph 9.4sec

Top speed 121mph

True MPG 65.7mpg

Gov't fuel economy 65.7mpg

CO2 emissions 97g/km

< Previous

Page 4 of 4