X
News

Saved lives and livelihoods

  • Positive tests up, tests conducted down
  • UK has second highest drink-drive limit in Europe
  • Join our campaign for zero limit
Words By What Car? Staff

Need a valuation?

Obtain a FREE used car valuation for any vehicle.

GB

An article image
An article image

As the law stands, drivers are perfectly entitled to get behind the wheel with anything up to 80mg/100ml of alcohol in their blood. At 81mg/100ml, though, they face arrest, a court appearance, a fine and a lengthy ban from driving. The knock-on effects of this often devastate their livelihoods and private life.

However, if the legal limit is lowered to effectively zero, there could be a case to instigate a tiered punishment system, the same as there is with virtually every other crime.

Take speeding, for example. If you're caught doing 45mph in a 40mph limit, you'll be fined 60 and given three points on your licence. If you're doing 90mph in a 40mph zone, you'll probably be banned. Should the same logic be applied to drink-driving?

The Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS) believes a tiered punishment system could work.

'If a 20mg limit was introduced, it would be feasible to have a system where any driver caught between 20mg/100ml and 50mg/100ml would get six points on their licence, which would stay there for 10 years,' says executive director Robert Gifford. 'That way, two smaller drink-drive offences in a 10-year period would result in a ban, and drivers over 50mg would be disqualified straight away.'

The AA believes that any driver caught above 50mg/100ml should be banned from driving, but admits disqualification might be too harsh if the limit was lowered to 20mg/100ml. However, Brake takes the hard line, and says any driver caught over 20mg should face a mandatory ban.