The modelRead full review
The Vauxhall Crossland is a creditable car in some respects, offering good equipment levels, excellent seating flexibility on select trims and a sizeable boot, but the competition has, in the main caught up, run it into the kerb and driven off into the sunset. The worst thing is that you have to pay extra for safety kit that should be standard these days, but it's also mediocre to drive and the rear seats are cramped. If you can get a fantastic deal that makes it much cheaper than anything else then fine, we respect why you would. Otherwise, stick to the Ford Puma, the Skoda Kamiq or the Volkswagen T-Roc – to name but a few of the better alternatives – instead.get the best price
The trimSee full equipment
SRi Nav trim is worth a look but you should add the safety pack. You'll get an 8.0in touchscreen, x2 USBs, sat-nav, rear parking sensors, front and rear armrests, 40/20/40 split seats, a height-adjustable boot floor, sliding and reclining rear seats, a black roof, an alarm, auto high beams, climate control, ambient lighting, 17in alloy wheels and privacy glass.
The engineSee full engine specs
With a healthy 109bhp it revs willingly and feels punchy enough to be the engine of choice. 0-62mph takes 10.5sec – quicker than the Skoda Kamiq 1.0 TSI 95 – and it's pretty efficient, too.
Roomy for its size and good to drive
The Stonic handles tidily and is well equipped, but it could b...
The Ford Ecosport’s chunky looks are easy to fall for, but it’...
The HR-V is competitive, but there are quieter and better-valu...