For This X1 has a flexible engine, the reassurance of four-wheel drive and isn’t prohibitively expensive.
Against There are a lot more practical cars for the money and opting for the xDrive model hikes up running costs.
This mid-range version is likely to be one of the most popular X1s but, unless you really need four-wheel drive, the sDrive version is probably a better bet.
Whether you consider the BMW X1 good value depends on how you look at it. Plenty of hatchbacks provide more space and similar performance for a lot less money, but if you judge it as an affordable pseudo-4x4, the X1 looks reasonably priced.
Rear-wheel-drive (sDrive) and four-wheel-drive (xDrive) models are available, and BMW reckons at least half of buyers will go for the lower running costs of the sDrive models.
Of the four engines, the 20d EfficientDynamics is the most economical, while losing little in performance to the regular 20d SE. It looks to provide the best compromise between power and running costs. The 18d is maybe a touch meagre for this sort of car, while the 23d’s performance needs to be weighed against much higher emissions and fuel consumption.
You get lots of equipment as standard, and BMW offers a range of servicing packages that are well worth a look.
I have owned this car since march and find it comfortable and economical. The 2.0 engine has enogh poke to get me out of any trouble and there is…
Great car! We've owned this now for 3 months and the costs of keeping it going just keep putting smiles on my wife and I's faces. We downsized from a…
What a disappointment. It seems that BMW rushed the development of this car to cash in on the SUV/crossover market. It is solid and well screwed…
Having owned BMW's for my last four cars I have to say i may be a little biased. I feel design and drive wise they just can't be beaten, especially…