Used test: Jaguar XE vs Volkswagen Arteon

The stylish Volkswagen Arteon is an attractive buy, but can it beat the badge cachet of a used Jaguar XE?...

New Volkswagen Arteon vs Jaguar XE

The Contenders

Jaguar XE 20t 200 Portfolio auto

List price when new £31,695

Price today £23,000*

Available from 2015-present

Recognised as the best handling car in the class and has strong badge appeal.

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI 190 DSG R-Line

List price when new £34,290

Price today £23,500*

Available from 2017-present

VW’s flagship model puts a suave coupé body over proven Passat mechanicals.

*Price today is based on a 2017 model with average mileage and full service history, correct at the time of writing

When making an entrance, don’t most of us yearn to effect some dash, swagger and panache? When it comes to used motoring haute couture, you might not dream of a Volkswagen, but is that all about to change?

Take the Arteon. It’s based on the Passat; a fine car but one you might describe as the automotive equivalent of a hardwearing, off-the-peg suit. For the Arteon, VW has torn that off in favour of Armani evening-wear pizzazz. It still has two rear doors, a big boot and sensible engines though – in this case, a 2.0-litre petrol with 187bhp – so can the Arteon live up to its suave style?

Used test: Jaguar XE vs Volkswagen Arteon

No need to introduce Jaguar as a builder of elegant cars. The XE is a regular saloon, but it has the badge and swooping lines to stand out, plus a new engine that so-happens to be a 2.0-litre petrol with 197bhp. A near-perfect fit, then, so time to pick the belle of the ball.

What are they like to drive? 

Neither car will give Grandma the willies with its straight-line pace, but both are agreeably brisk, allowing you to hit the motorway or nip past a dawdling Sunday driver without any drama.

The Arteon is quicker when you want it to be, though, building speed with more urgency when you put your foot down. With the XE having the more powerful engine, one can only assume that’s down to its ponderous eight-speed automatic gearbox, which slurs through gears and hesitates when pulling out of junctions and on to roundabouts, leading to the occasional blasphemous outburst. The Arteon’s seven-speed dual-clutch auto ’box is jerkier in stop-start traffic but responds more promptly when pulling away, and pings up and down through the gears more energetically.

Used test: Jaguar XE vs Volkswagen Arteon

Both engines transmit a little vibration through to the steering wheel at idle; that disappears when you’re under way in the XE but lingers until around 1500rpm in the Arteon. The engines are relatively hushed when worked harder, but they sound different; the XE’s emits a higher-pitched rasp compared with the Arteon’s more gravelly tone.

At a 70mph cruise, both engines settle into the background, leaving just a bit of wind noise in the XE. The Arteon has a touch less gusty flutter (its frameless doors were fitted with optional laminated sound insulating glass, a £535 cost when new) but more road and suspension noise.

Used test: Jaguar XE vs Volkswagen Arteon

Both cars ride well, but the Arteon is more comfortable – in the main. With optional DCC adaptive dampers fitted (£820), it smooths over motorway ripples better than the XE and irons out patches of broken asphalt around town more effectively. However, the XE is more composed over potholes that the Arteon slams into.

The Passat is a surefooted car around corners, but it’s hardly engaging. Bearing in mind that the same mechanicals underpin the Arteon, there’s been a heck of a transformation. With our car’s suspension in Normal mode (the second of three settings), it tucks into corners neatly, with minimal body lean, and its steering is nicely weighted and precise.

Used test: Jaguar XE vs Volkswagen Arteon

That said, if you live for driving pleasure alone, the XE will tickle you pink. You can stroke it along intuitively. It leans a little more, but its steering is more feelsome. And if the road is wet, the XE’s rear-wheel drive layout delivers greater traction under acceleration than the front-wheel-drive Arteon, which scrabbles for grip out of tighter turns.

Next: What are they like inside? >

Page 1 of 4