Sponsored

In partnership with Autotrader

Used test: Audi Q2 vs Volkswagen T-Roc: interiors

Buy either of these small SUVs at three years old and you'll save good money off new, but which one should you go for? We have the answer

Audi Q2 - interior

Interiors

Driving position, visibility, build quality, practicality

Both of our SUVs get height and reach-adjustable steering wheels and a decent amount of movement in their seats, but neither got adjustable lumbar support as standard from new.

advertisement

scroll for more

From a quality perspective, the Audi Q2's interior is excellent, with plush materials featured throughout and a logical layout to all the buttons and switches.

The Volkswagen T-Roc isn't quite so stellar in this department. Yes, you can get some colourful trim on the dashboard, but the plastics used are what you’d expect to find in a cheap city car, not a £30,000-from-new SUV. There are no soft-touch materials anywhere and the doors have only a tiny amount of fabric for your elbows. It’s a real shame, because the dashboard layout is just as logical as the Q2’s.

New Hyundai Kona & Volkswagen T-Roc vs Seat Arona

The Q2's S line trim comes with a 7.0in screen, DAB radio, Bluetooth and sat-nav, as well as Apple CarPlay and Android Auto phone connectivity. Controlled by a dial between the seats, the system is easy to use on the move, thanks to clear, responsive menus and sharp graphics. You could have upgraded to an 8.3in screen with a more sophisticated sat-nav, but the standard system is plenty good enough.

Steve Huntingford

Steve Huntingford

Updated: 2 September 2022

Car reviews

Volkswagen T-Roc front driving

Volkswagen T-Roc

Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Red

Audi Q2 front cornering

Audi Q2

Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Grey

VW T-Roc Cabriolet front cornering

Volkswagen T-Roc Cabriolet

Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Red Star Rating Grey Star Rating Grey

View all new car reviews

advertisement

scroll for more

Unlike the Q2, the T-Roc’s infotainment is controlled by a touchscreen only. The 8.0in system has sharp graphics and well-organised menus, but some of the icons are a little too small to hit accurately on the move. The shortcut buttons around the screen’s edges are welcome, because they make it easier to jump to the menu that you want, but we still prefer the rotary controller of the Q2.

Both cars have useful cubbies in front of the gear selector, with the T-Roc’s being more generous in size. When you take into account the door pockets and other cubbies, it’s the T-Roc that offers the most storage space.

As long as you avoid the temptation to choose a car that’s had the optional sunroof or panoramic roof added, most front seat occupants will have plenty of head room in both cars. The T-Roc’s interior is wider front and rear, though.

New Hyundai Kona & Volkswagen T-Roc vs Seat Arona

The T-Roc and Q2 are equal for rear leg room, but the T-Roc has more rear head room. Whichever one you go for, fitting three adults across the rear seats is a squeeze.

advertisement

scroll for more

Both cars come with 60/40 split-folding rear seatbacks, but the Q2 had the option from new of a more flexible 40/20/40 configuration. The T-Roc has a marginally bigger boot than the Q2.


<< Previous | Next: What will they cost? >>

Page 2 of 4

Used

News and advice

News

Kia PV5 Cargo L2/H2 front side static

Kia PV5 Cargo and Chassis to be eligible for Plug-in Van Grant

Sponsored

Mercedes EQE with depreciation graph

The 10 fastest-depreciating electric cars

News

Lotus Type 135 rear teaser brightened

New Lotus hybrid supercar to arrive in 2028 powered by 671bhp V8 engine

News

Peugeot 208 front static

Peugeot 208 and 2008 gain new mid-spec Envy trim for £23k

Feature

Three generations of Nissan Qashqai

20 years of Qashqai: the model that started the family crossover revolution

Feature

Mazda CX-5 front static long termer

Mazda CX-5 long-term test